Majmonides

Though I think the position would be more suitable for ones who at least read Tanakh in hebrew and had little bit deepened study around ontology, I think it may be useful for not much advanced in Tanakh studies, jewish religion, philosophy and similar, if they're okey with not understanding everything. For me the most precious for today are parts which focused on 'the idea of God'; writing about God is one and how attributes of God 'correlate', they were, I would say, brilliant; exact and deepened. There is some help around what should not be thought and where the thought shouldn't go - quite simple and understandable and though I wouldn't say it was something very complicated, I wouldn't be able to get my mind to such way of thinking and concluding. Also interesting were parts with some of 'jewish rules' and explanations from where these may be, though there were more difficult parts and it may be more useful for practitioners. For me the most difficult where probably pieces typically ontological, like, when it gets to spheres and some more general topics about the creation. Like, it was said it's obvious, though generally it was none; I could differ some things, but it's rather easy to recognize a moment where ur not prepared enough. As it was one of my first books mostly focused on jewish theology, I have no opinion about some pieces for I couldn't resonate, but I've found some things which may be helpful with better understanding on my actual level. I give 8 stars mostly for being unable to even think about some subjects, maybe for dozens of years I will give more (or less :pp). Generally I wouldn't recommend a book to a person completely not interested in judaism, but if someone read a little, I think it is possible to 'get something for oneself', not necessarily while being a scholar since early childhood. There is some additional educational value for at the end of the book author shows straightforward how he views the main goal of longlasting, everyday engaged studies and jewish prayers. Position could be juicy for feminist perspective analysis.